|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
well i got bored and this is my favourite pastime...arguing or discussing with my fellow learned friends
so offer up what you want to discuss/argue and ill do my best Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:05 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
sure i love to argue you can choose the topic but i would like to argue the ethics/morals of war Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:22 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
sure i love to argue you can choose the topic but i would like to argue the ethics/morals of war
ah a topic i love...you can start Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:23 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
sure i love to argue you can choose the topic but i would like to argue the ethics/morals of war
ok ill start...
war is ok if you have a divine purpose behind the war e.g. to help the people of the invaded land, to save people, to reclaim lost ground etc. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:27 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
on how to kill the enemy it must be humane the use of gas for example bullets are faster and relatively painless you should never purposefully inflict pain and suffering Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:33 pm |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
ok ill start...
war is ok if you have a divine purpose behind the war e.g. to help the people of the invaded land, to save people, to reclaim lost ground etc.
But what if that lost ground was never yours to begin with? For example, nation 1 invades nation 2, nation 2 has a resistance movement that forces nation 1 out after many years. Nation 1 comes back even more powerful.
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:34 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
on how to kill the enemy it must be humane the use of gas for example bullets are faster and relatively painless you should never purposefully inflict pain and suffering
but what if your enemy are those of the undivine and purposly inflict pain and suffering? would it be rightfull to use biochemichal or yes even nuclear weapons then? Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:35 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
But what if that lost ground was never yours to begin with? For example, nation 1 invades nation 2, nation 2 has a resistance movement that forces nation 1 out after many years. Nation 1 comes back even more powerful.
in the words of the cop they shouldnt have resisted in the first place lol
no i meant as in the sense of claiming rightful ground Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:36 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
ok ill start...
war is ok if you have a divine purpose behind the war e.g. to help the people of the invaded land, to save people, to reclaim lost ground etc.
so you cant be the aggressor Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:36 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
but what if your enemy are those of the undivine and purposly inflict pain and suffering? would it be rightfull to use biochemichal or yes even nuclear weapons then? nukes are fine as a last resort but never biochemical never
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:37 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
so you cant be the aggressor
if only john...if everyone agreed to that there wouldnt be war to start with...but yes fundamentaly Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:38 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
but what if your enemy are those of the undivine and purposly inflict pain and suffering? would it be rightfull to use biochemichal or yes even nuclear weapons then? nukes are fine as a last resort but never biochemical never
biochemichal weapons are a poor mans nukes and has replaced gas Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:39 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
in the words of the cop they shouldnt have resisted in the first place lol
no i meant as in the sense of claiming rightful ground what is rightful ground do mean like the Hebrews in the conquering of the land of canaan
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:40 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
biochemichal weapons are a poor mans nukes and has replaced gas then he shouldnt try to fight a war
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:40 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
in the words of the cop they shouldnt have resisted in the first place lol
no i meant as in the sense of claiming rightful ground what is rightful ground do mean like the Hebrews in the conquering of the land of canaan
land first owned by the invader but lost
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:41 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
biochemichal weapons are a poor mans nukes and has replaced gas then he shouldnt try to fight a war
and there is your conclusion...war should not be fought entirely! no matter discussing the morals and ethics Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:42 pm |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
in the words of the cop they shouldnt have resisted in the first place lol
no i meant as in the sense of claiming rightful ground what is rightful ground do mean like the Hebrews in the conquering of the land of canaan
Oo... The Israel/Palestine conflict. That's a touchy one. I personally think they should just stop being so dead set they one is the good guy, one is the bad guy, and learn to live together.
Biochemical weapons are cheap. Biological weapons are even more cheap. Especially viruses.
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:42 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
But what if that lost ground was never yours to begin with? For example, nation 1 invades nation 2, nation 2 has a resistance movement that forces nation 1 out after many years. Nation 1 comes back even more powerful.
anything u wanna discuss awe? Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:43 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
Oo... The Israel/Palestine conflict. That's a touchy one. I personally think they should just stop being so dead set they one is the good guy, one is the bad guy, and learn to live together.
Biochemical weapons are cheap. Biological weapons are even more cheap. Especially viruses.
so price makes makes right
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:44 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
Oo... The Israel/Palestine conflict. That's a touchy one. I personally think they should just stop being so dead set they one is the good guy, one is the bad guy, and learn to live together.
Biochemical weapons are cheap. Biological weapons are even more cheap. Especially viruses.
but biochemichal are easier to find Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:44 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
Oo... The Israel/Palestine conflict. That's a touchy one. I personally think they should just stop being so dead set they one is the good guy, one is the bad guy, and learn to live together.
Biochemical weapons are cheap. Biological weapons are even more cheap. Especially viruses.
btw have you noticed all wars when you involve the us of a today are based around oil? Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:45 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
and there is your conclusion...war should not be fought entirely! no matter discussing the morals and ethics no if you cant sustain a proper army dont pick a fight if youare invaded call for help and engage in guerrilla warfare
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:46 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
and there is your conclusion...war should not be fought entirely! no matter discussing the morals and ethics no if you cant sustain a proper army dont pick a fight if youare invaded call for help and engage in guerrilla warfare
its all car bombs and hot water from windows now tho Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:48 pm |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
btw have you noticed all wars when you involve the us of a today are based around oil?
Yea, I'm not sure why we're in Iraq for if we're not there for the oil. I mean, just a couple years before the Guld War Iraq was an ally. I know we're in Afghanistan to catch the world's hide and seek Champion, though.
@Harland: I mean cheap as in, not fair, dirty, not price wise. Bio weapons are banned for a reason. At least I think they're banned. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:49 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
Yea, I'm not sure why we're in Iraq for if we're not there for the oil. I mean, just a couple years before the Guld War Iraq was an ally. I know we're in Afghanistan to catch the world's hide and seek Champion, though.
@Harland: I mean cheap as in, not fair, dirty, not price wise. Bio weapons are banned for a reason. At least I think they're banned.
yeah but i dont believe osama bin laden is one person! and bio weapons arent illeagal they are the poor mans nukes according to mu religious ed teacher Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:51 pm |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yeah but i dont believe osama bin laden is one person! and bio weapons arent illeagal they are the poor mans nukes according to mu religious ed teacher
Well, I know we in America haven't used bio weapons since we killed all the natives. We have used nukes though..
Biological weapons are easy to make, if you have the right stuff. If a terrorist gets one of the remianing smallpox samples, we're in for one nas ty (I think that word is censored by MP) pandemic. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:53 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Awesome-o-saurus The Not-So-Great
Well, I know we in America haven't used bio weapons since we killed all the natives. We have used nukes though..
Biological weapons are easy to make, if you have the right stuff. If a terrorist gets one of the remianing smallpox samples, we're in for one nas ty (I think that word is censored by MP) pandemic.
yeah but biochemichal are even easier!
just get a dangerous chemichal e.g. chlorine and hook it up to a bomb Permalink | August 13, 2009, 6:55 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yeah but biochemichal are even easier!
just get a dangerous chemichal e.g. chlorine and hook it up to a bomb
Chlorine is mostly harmless.
What you want is chlorine GAS.
And if bombs are involved, you want radioactive materials instead of swimming pool stuff. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:01 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Areetsa C
Chlorine is mostly harmless.
What you want is chlorine GAS.
And if bombs are involved, you want radioactive materials instead of swimming pool stuff.
yes but i said POOR mans NUKE...a nuke that isnt radioactive and doesnt cost much...like an easy to get chemical Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:03 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yes but i said POOR mans NUKE...a nuke that isnt radioactive and doesnt cost much...like an easy to get chemical
Chlorine and ammonia = chlorine gas.
How hard is it to get hold of bleach and a bit of household ammonia?
Oh, also, if you like your lungs you shouldn't use an empty bleach bottle as an emergency toilet. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:07 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Areetsa C
Chlorine and ammonia = chlorine gas.
How hard is it to get hold of bleach and a bit of household ammonia?
in the middle east...cmon! u cant get toothpaste out there for...somthins sake! Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:09 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
in the middle east...cmon! u cant get toothpaste out there for...somthins sake!
Who said anything about the middle east?
You should be more worried about people like me who live in the first world and know all sorts of politically incorrect things. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:10 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
its all car bombs and hot water from windows now tho look at the Viet Cong they beat the largest army in the world with out car bombs or suicide bombers
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:11 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Areetsa C
Who said anything about the middle east?
You should be more worried about people like me who live in the first world and know all sorts of politically incorrect things.
im more worried about myself and people like me who see outside of the system! Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:12 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yeah but i dont believe osama bin laden is one person! and bio weapons arent illeagal they are the poor mans nukes according to mu religious ed teacher
no offense to him but what does he know Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:13 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
its all car bombs and hot water from windows now tho look at the Viet Cong they beat the largest army in the world with out car bombs or suicide bombers
yes but they had a huge series of tunnnels and local knowledge...anyway i gotta go i will talk more tommorow Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:13 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yes but they had a huge series of tunnnels and local knowledge...anyway i gotta go i will talk more tommorow yeah thats out smarting the enemy
Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:15 pm |
|
|
Ithink if we kill Osama the world will just turn intoa big rainbow! I think that the U.S is only in Iraq for oil. I think that 9/11 WAS wrong though I don't see a connection between that and Iraq. Permalink | August 13, 2009, 7:29 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
yes but they had a huge series of tunnnels and local knowledge...anyway i gotta go i will talk more tommorow yeah thats out smarting the enemy
heeeeerrrrreeeee's khal! Permalink | August 14, 2009, 7:42 am |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Squirelly .
Ithink if we kill Osama the world will just turn intoa big rainbow! I think that the U.S is only in Iraq for oil. I think that 9/11 WAS wrong though I don't see a connection between that and Iraq.
o...k.....hang on, where did we mention 9 11? Permalink | August 15, 2009, 6:52 pm |
|
|
I am merely stating my opinion
Permalink | August 15, 2009, 8:02 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Squirelly .
I am merely stating my opinion
we went to iraq to oust a dictator and al quida who planned the attacks Permalink | August 15, 2009, 10:30 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Squirelly .
I am merely stating my opinion
we went to iraq to oust a dictator and al quida who planned the attacks
u went to iraq for oil...dont let the government tell u any different Permalink | August 16, 2009, 9:11 am |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Squirelly .
I am merely stating my opinion
ah...random opinion tho Permalink | August 16, 2009, 9:12 am |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
u went to iraq for oil...dont let the government tell u any different
so your telling me that Saddam Hussein's aid to terrorist groups had nothing to do with our intervention there Permalink | August 16, 2009, 10:53 am |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
so your telling me that Saddam Hussein's aid to terrorist groups had nothing to do with our intervention there
yup...u live in the oil capital of the world...if theres a war for an oil rich country america will be on the frontline Permalink | August 16, 2009, 12:10 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
yup...u live in the oil capital of the world...if theres a war for an oil rich country america will be on the frontline is that why we went into Vietnam and Korea?
Permalink | August 16, 2009, 12:12 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
yup...u live in the oil capital of the world...if theres a war for an oil rich country america will be on the frontline is that why we went into Vietnam and Korea?
that was different...when every single capitalist hated communism and oil was plentiful Permalink | August 16, 2009, 12:18 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Father Khal
that was different...when every single capitalist hated communism and oil was plentiful what about our intervention in afganistan there is no oil there
Permalink | August 16, 2009, 12:58 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
Quoting Lt. John Harland
Quoting Father Khal
that was different...when every single capitalist hated communism and oil was plentiful what about our intervention in afganistan there is no oil there
again difference...russia was there first...then us and we asked foor ur help Permalink | August 16, 2009, 1:02 pm | |
|