MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop RA-CAS-UENMilitary
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
Conversation »
Prussia-Egypt surrender accords
 Group moderator 
My current demands stand at these:
Sign over Libya and Sudan to me
limit his army to under one million
no stealth weapons and/or aircraft in his arsenal
a navy of less than 100 boats

Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 8:12 pm
 Group admin 
I will decline to make my two cents known until after Prusso-Egypt has made their comment.
Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 10:30 pm
Quoting Cole Atelian
My current demands stand at these:
Sign over Libya and Sudan to me
limit his army to under one million
no stealth weapons and/or aircraft in his arsenal
a navy of less than 100 boats

I could sign over Libya, but everything else, NO. Why would I sign over both Sudan and Libya to you? Are you trying to box me in or something? I knew you were saving Egypt for dessert...

And like I said, reducing military numbers is useless in any situation. They'll just come back up at some point unless you enforce the numbers- and that's just plain ridiculous as well.
Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 10:45 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Jeffery Smith
Quoting Field Marshal Cliffe
I could sign over Libya, but everything else, NO. Why would I sign over both Sudan and Libya to you? Are you trying to box me in or something? I knew you were saving Egypt for dessert...

And like I said, reducing military numbers is useless in any situation. They'll just come back up at some point unless you enforce the numbers- and that's just plain ridiculous as well.


I understand the Sudan part, you have a point there. As for the reduction, that is the most enforced and essential part of most truces. It is the most important part of a truce, from a military and political standing. This reduction is necessary, it can't be avoided. You eiter reduce it now and be at peace or have it reduced to 0 by warfare.

Agreed. I made a similar notion in the ICF. The reduction of forces is not temporary, it is permanent. This means that your entire armed forces must be kept at the 1 million mark or reinforcement of the circumstance will be set upon.
Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 10:58 pm
Quoting Field Marshal Cliffe
I could sign over Libya, but everything else, NO. Why would I sign over both Sudan and Libya to you? Are you trying to box me in or something? I knew you were saving Egypt for dessert...

And like I said, reducing military numbers is useless in any situation. They'll just come back up at some point unless you enforce the numbers- and that's just plain ridiculous as well.

I'm sorry to go against you on this but really, arguing is useless. If you don't make Cole happy, you'll just be thrust back into a losing war. If you go back into war, you can make certain that they won't let you opt out and bargain a second time. So take what you are given now, and lose graciously. Maybe you can still have Sudan, but decreasing your forces is really a must.
Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 10:58 pm
 Group moderator 
I will agree not to force Tim to give up sudan but i am adiment on my other demands.
Permalink
| November 24, 2009, 11:03 pm
Quoting Cole Atelian
I will agree not to force Tim to give up sudan but i am adiment on my other demands.

Alright. I guess I have to then. I don't have that many ships anyway...
Permalink
| November 25, 2009, 2:17 pm
i will add this to Poland too, i guess. How much do you want to give us there? :p
Permalink
| November 25, 2009, 3:39 pm
 Group moderator 
Quoting Field Marshal Cliffe
Alright. I guess I have to then. I don't have that many ships anyway...

Thank you. I am glad to have this war over. When do you want my observers to come and watch you destroy your stealth air craft and naval ships. I am inviting observers from Alaska and Ukraine to also confirm that my demands have been met.
Permalink
| November 26, 2009, 10:30 am
 Group moderator 
You know, you could use your non-stealth aircraft to destroy your stealth aircraft in a strafing run practice...
Permalink
| November 26, 2009, 2:08 pm
 Group admin 
@ FM cliffe:

I will sell you Su-27s in exchange for your stealth fleet. If you wish for some diversity, I could sell you Tu-225s, MiG-29s, or Ka-63s. Black Sharks are also an option. It's a shame to let Cole destroy them all...
Permalink
| November 26, 2009, 4:34 pm
 Group moderator 
I will allow Cliffe to sell the equipment that would other wise be destroyed. If and only if all of the equipment is accounted for.
Permalink
| November 26, 2009, 4:38 pm
 Group admin 
In any future invasions if Prusso-Egypt, I will provide Field Marshal Cliffe with full military support, regardless of the attackers.
Permalink
| November 27, 2009, 1:22 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Jack Ford
@ FM cliffe:

I will sell you Su-27s in exchange for your stealth fleet. If you wish for some diversity, I could sell you Tu-225s, MiG-29s, or Ka-63s. Black Sharks are also an option. It's a shame to let Cole destroy them all...
Su-27 and MiG-29 includes all variants. I also have MiG-1.44s and Su-47s, I forgot to mention.

Permalink
| December 4, 2009, 11:08 pm
Group moderators have locked this conversation.
Other topics
student teen kid toy play lego child video game hobby blocks construction toy legos fun games



LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop RA-CAS-UENMilitary


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use