MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop Rebel AllianceStar Wars
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
Conversation »
UT-AT is a walker or not?
Join to comment
 Group admin 
Hey I just wanted to know that UT-AT is a walker?
Permalink
| July 13, 2009, 2:36 pm
Quoting erdelyi balazs
Hey I just wanted to know that UT-AT is a walker?

yes it is.
Permalink
| July 13, 2009, 2:42 pm
Quoting erdelyi balazs
Hey I just wanted to know that UT-AT is a walker?

Ummmm... depends of what is walkers definition- i would say it is not walker because it doesn't walk- it floats by repulsorlift- it has strange kinda skis under it but no legs- so i wouldn't say it a walker...
Permalink
| July 13, 2009, 2:45 pm
 Group moderator 
UT-AT in my opinion isnt a walker-just because its part of the XX-XX group which are mostly walkers eg. AT-AT AT-TE AT-RT AT-AP etc doesnt mean its a walker.
Permalink
| July 18, 2009, 2:26 pm
Quoting Doctor Ownage
UT-AT in my opinion isnt a walker-just because its part of the XX-XX group which are mostly walkers eg. AT-AT AT-TE AT-RT AT-AP etc doesnt mean its a walker.

All other XX-XX group vehicles are AT-XX but Ut-At is not so it is not same sort of All terrain vehicle- but unstable terrain repulsorlift vehicle- so it's not walker- btw check out my new mocs...
Permalink
| July 19, 2009, 7:03 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting swash buckler
All other XX-XX group vehicles are AT-XX but Ut-At is not so it is not same sort of All terrain vehicle- but unstable terrain repulsorlift vehicle- so it's not walker- btw check out my new mocs...

been there done that :) i like the raxus prime. but back to the topic. xx-xx group includes utat, no? cause it doesnt HAVE to be at.... but anyway i think we can come to the conclusion that it ISNT because it doesnt hav legs nor walk.
Permalink
| July 19, 2009, 2:14 pm
Quoting Dr, Ownage
been there done that :) i like the raxus prime. but back to the topic. xx-xx group includes utat, no? cause it doesnt HAVE to be at.... but anyway i think we can come to the conclusion that it ISNT because it doesnt hav legs nor walk.

Thanks i would like to have a ratings though- maybe after rebelcommandocontest ;)- anyway i meant that there is no other vehicle in that xx-xx group you defined that doesn't start with At- so all of those are part of xx-xx group but those At:s are walkers (all-terrain) so Ut-At is not part of that group- anyway we agree then- Ut-At is not walker- simply because walkers walk Ut-At don't so simple as that...
Permalink
| July 19, 2009, 2:21 pm
Quoting swash buckler
Thanks i would like to have a ratings though- maybe after rebelcommandocontest ;)- anyway i meant that there is no other vehicle in that xx-xx group you defined that doesn't start with At- so all of those are part of xx-xx group but those At:s are walkers (all-terrain) so Ut-At is not part of that group- anyway we agree then- Ut-At is not walker- simply because walkers walk Ut-At don't so simple as that...


Yeah I wouldn't classify a UT-AT as a walker either. Hey swash could you also check out my A-wing latest moc?
Permalink
| July 20, 2009, 3:00 am
 Group moderator 
i think we can end this conversation at that...
Permalink
| July 20, 2009, 4:59 am
Other topics
« UT-AT is a walker or not?
student teen kid toy play lego child video game hobby blocks construction toy legos fun games



LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop Rebel AllianceStar Wars


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use