MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop The Fellowship of the BrickLord of the Rings
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
Conversation »
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies!
Join to comment
Thanks to Mark Murphy for letting me create this.

Hey guy! Some of you probably know this already, but in case you don't, the final Hobbit film has been renamed to "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" instead of "There and Back Again," which will now be the title of the boxed set. (When it eventually comes out)

So, what do you think of the new title? Love it? Hate it? Unsure?

I am personally fine with it, even though I quite liked TABA.

As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D
Permalink
| April 25, 2014, 1:02 pm
Quoting Mark McPeek
Thanks to Mark Murphy for letting me create this.

Hey guy! Some of you probably know this already, but in case you don't, the final Hobbit film has been renamed to "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" instead of "There and Back Again," which will now be the title of the boxed set. (When it eventually comes out)

So, what do you think of the new title? Love it? Hate it? Unsure?

I am personally fine with it, even though I quite liked TABA.

As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D
I heard that the box set might be named "There and Back Again", but I only found out yesterday, actually, that the last film would be called "The Battle of Five Armies". Now, I am not a Tokein nerd, (but I wanna be 83) so what are the five armies? I gather Dwarves, Elves, and Orcs maybe. But I don't know.

Who thinks they should do "The Adventures of Tom Bombadil"?
Permalink
| April 25, 2014, 1:07 pm
Didn't know that they were changing the title. I knew that was a title they had originally considered though. I don't mind it at all, in fact I think it's a pretty good title. It will definitely attract the attention of more than just the Tolkien fans.

Also New Line recently registered a new title: The Hobbit: Into the Fire. Personally I think that's kind of cheesey but I'm hoping it's for a video game or board game.
Permalink
| April 25, 2014, 2:06 pm
Quoting Mark McPeek

Interesting... I'm fine either way, though I think TABA was a better title.

Oh hurray! Now they can add even more stuff to the story! :P
Permalink
| April 25, 2014, 11:44 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Bumblebee 5253
Quoting Mark McPeek
Thanks to Mark Murphy for letting me create this.

Hey guy! Some of you probably know this already, but in case you don't, the final Hobbit film has been renamed to "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" instead of "There and Back Again," which will now be the title of the boxed set. (When it eventually comes out)

So, what do you think of the new title? Love it? Hate it? Unsure?

I am personally fine with it, even though I quite liked TABA.

As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D
) so what are the five armies? I gather Dwarves, Elves, and Orcs maybe. But I don't know.

Who thinks they should do "The Adventures of Tom Bombadil"?

the five armies are: Men, Dwarves, Elves, Orcs, and Wargs.

As for Bombadil, awesome as it would be, there is no way they would ever make his stories, when they left him out of LOTR.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 12:20 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark McPeek
Thanks to Mark Murphy for letting me create this.

Hey guy! Some of you probably know this already, but in case you don't, the final Hobbit film has been renamed to "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" instead of "There and Back Again," which will now be the title of the boxed set. (When it eventually comes out)

So, what do you think of the new title? Love it? Hate it? Unsure?

I am personally fine with it, even though I quite liked TABA.

As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D

The new title is ok, but I am really disappointed. I really liked the old title.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 12:21 am
I liked the old title but I think they had good reasons for changing it and I am fine wih the new one.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 6:42 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark Murphy
the five armies are: Men, Dwarves, Elves, Orcs, and Wargs.

As for Bombadil, awesome as it would be, there is no way they would ever make his stories, when they left him out of LOTR.

Yes... But maybe they can make it as a seperate adventure as an excuse to the disappointed fans. Though I think that there isn't enough plot and tention in ATB for an own story, even if they added the chapters of FOTR. Still it could be a possible 6th Middle-earth movie, since the adventures in the Old Forest and the Barrow-downs don't have to do anything with the other chapters in the book.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 7:54 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Evan Botkin
Didn't know that they were changing the title. I knew that was a title they had originally considered though. I don't mind it at all, in fact I think it's a pretty good title. It will definitely attract the attention of more than just the Tolkien fans.

Also New Line recently registered a new title: The Hobbit: Into the Fire. Personally I think that's kind of cheesey but I'm hoping it's for a video game or board game.

Same here. When I heard that they registered the title Into the Fire, I was very shocked. So in the end I felt quite satisfied when they said that it is "The Battle of the Five Armies" now. That battle is my favorite of all Middle-Earth battles, because it's one of only a few where so many races take part.

Though I still liked the official title "There and back again" better, but I'm relieved that they will still use it as title for the whole movie trilogy.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 8:03 am
Quoting Mark Murphy
the five armies are: Men, Dwarves, Elves, Orcs, and Wargs.

As for Bombadil, awesome as it would be, there is no way they would ever make his stories, when they left him out of LOTR.


Hmm... I always thought the fifth army was the Eagles. As for the "Into the Fire" name; that was the third title they considered. I'm relieved that they did not use it. I agree with you about the new title, although I think that TABA is a better suited name for the whole trilogy.

Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 10:50 am
Quoting Mark McPeek
Hmm... I always thought the fifth army was the Eagles.

Yeah, that's what I always thought too. The Wargs were (in my mind) part of the Orc army.
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 2:46 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark McPeek

Hmm... I always thought the fifth army was the Eagles. As for the "Into the Fire" name; that was the third title they considered. I'm relieved that they did not use it. I agree with you about the new title, although I think that TABA is a better suited name for the whole trilogy.

No, Tolkien says in the Hobbit "it was called the Battle of Five Armies, and it was very terrible. Upon one side were the Goblins and the wild Wolves, and upon the other were Elves and Men and Dwarves"
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 6:27 pm
Quoting Mark Murphy
the five armies are: Men, Dwarves, Elves, Orcs, and Wargs.

As for Bombadil, awesome as it would be, there is no way they would ever make his stories, when they left him out of LOTR.

MEN! I knew there was a fourth I remembered. Brain fade :P. I've been looking into Bombadil, it su-cks that they disincluded him though. Have you read that book?
Permalink
| April 26, 2014, 6:34 pm
 Group moderator 
Quoting Bumblebee 5253
MEN! I knew there was a fourth I remembered. Brain fade :P. I've been looking into Bombadil, it su-cks that they disincluded him though. Have you read that book?
I was really bummed too. (once I found out he was in it at all. He's like Peeves, you wouldn't know who in the world he is unless you read the book(s) he was in)
There was a guy who dressed up as him for the Official trading card game though!!

http://evenflow.jefflion.net/bombadil/images/decipher_tcg.jpg


He looks alright, but he's wearing way too much blue. :P
Permalink
| April 27, 2014, 5:29 pm
 Group moderator 
I personally like the change. "There and Back Again" is fit for the boxed set, and not the last movie.
As for "Into the Fire".... http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/fe/db/e2/fedbe29d638a3feee27e3a37ce5089fc.jpg
Permalink
| April 27, 2014, 5:33 pm
Quoting David .
I personally like the change. "There and Back Again" is fit for the boxed set, and not the last movie.
As for "Into the Fire".... http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/fe/db/e2/fedbe29d638a3feee27e3a37ce5089fc.jpg

Sorry, fell off my chair. Haha!
Permalink
| April 28, 2014, 3:46 pm
I personally don't care, since the movie is going to be the opposite of awesome. Desolation of Smaug was just, ugh.
Permalink
| April 28, 2014, 3:46 pm
I said it like that to avoid moderation.
Permalink
| April 28, 2014, 3:47 pm
Quoting David .
Quoting Bumblebee 5253
MEN! I knew there was a fourth I remembered. Brain fade :P. I've been looking into Bombadil, it su-cks that they disincluded him though. Have you read that book?
I was really bummed too. (once I found out he was in it at all. He's like Peeves, you wouldn't know who in the world he is unless you read the book(s) he was in)
There was a guy who dressed up as him for the Official trading card game though!!

http://evenflow.jefflion.net/bombadil/images/decipher_tcg.jpg


He looks alright, but he's wearing way too much blue. :P


I love this representation of him though!
Permalink
| April 28, 2014, 10:13 pm
I personally liked There and Back Again much better...Battle of the Five Armies isn't bad, but they could've thought up a better title
Permalink
| April 28, 2014, 10:17 pm
 Group moderator 
I personally like "Into The Fire" as a good name, better than BOTFA, but There and Back Again beats them both.
Permalink
| April 29, 2014, 4:11 pm
Quoting ~ Caleb ~
I personally like "Into The Fire" as a good name, better than BOTFA, but There and Back Again beats them both.



Same, I like There and Back Again way better.
Permalink
| April 29, 2014, 4:47 pm
Quoting Mark McPeek
Thanks to Mark Murphy for letting me create this.

Hey guy! Some of you probably know this already, but in case you don't, the final Hobbit film has been renamed to "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" instead of "There and Back Again," which will now be the title of the boxed set. (When it eventually comes out)

So, what do you think of the new title? Love it? Hate it? Unsure?

I am personally fine with it, even though I quite liked TABA.

As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D

Hurray for extended versions!

Hmm... that's an alright title, but personally I loved There and Back Again. I think it's a great phrase that's not used too much in the Middle Earth universe. It also gave the film a much more reflective, end-of-the-line type feel, rather than suggest a film that's merely centered around an enormous battle (even though the movie probably will be).
Permalink
| April 29, 2014, 8:45 pm
 Group moderator 
Quoting Mark McPeek


As a side-note: Peter Jackson also said that the EE of The DoS will be about 25+ minutes longer! :D

Hurray!!!
But they better not put in a puke-worthy scene like in UJ... (the extended Goblin town song. I felt like I was watching a scene from Jabbas palace!)
Permalink
| April 29, 2014, 8:59 pm
Quoting Mark Murphy
No, Tolkien says in the Hobbit "it was called the Battle of Five Armies, and it was very terrible. Upon one side were the Goblins and the wild Wolves, and upon the other were Elves and Men and Dwarves"

My bad. You are right. I should know that after reading it 12 times. ;)

Permalink
| April 29, 2014, 10:48 pm
Quoting David .
Hurray!!!
But they better not put in a puke-worthy scene like in UJ... (the extended Goblin town song. I felt like I was watching a scene from Jabbas palace!)

I don't have the extended edition yet. I'm going to wait until they release all three extended versions as a box set.
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 8:12 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Evan Botkin
I don't have the extended edition yet. I'm going to wait until they release all three extended versions as a box set.

I have both, the extended and the normal version of AUJ, but the extended has only 13 minutes extra runtime and you can watch the few missing scenes on youtube, too...
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 9:51 am
 Group admin 
Quoting David .
Hurray!!!
But they better not put in a puke-worthy scene like in UJ... (the extended Goblin town song. I felt like I was watching a scene from Jabbas palace!)

Haha, good comparision! There are many paralels between them :D
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 9:53 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting Michael Kringe
Haha, good comparision! There are many paralels between them :D

did you see my comment in the timeline group?
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 10:08 am
 Group admin 
Quoting A M
Hurray for extended versions!

Hmm... that's an alright title, but personally I loved There and Back Again. I think it's a great phrase that's not used too much in the Middle Earth universe. It also gave the film a much more reflective, end-of-the-line type feel, rather than suggest a film that's merely centered around an enormous battle (even though the movie probably will be).

I agreem the last title was a lot more meaningful.
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 11:01 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting David .
Hurray!!!
But they better not put in a puke-worthy scene like in UJ... (the extended Goblin town song. I felt like I was watching a scene from Jabbas palace!)

What!? I loved the goblin town song! It was my favorite added scene, because it was one of the only things they added that was in the book.
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 11:02 pm
Quoting Evan Botkin
Also New Line recently registered a new title: The Hobbit: Into the Fire. Personally I think that's kind of cheesey but I'm hoping it's for a video game or board game.

Into Fire that sounds cool
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 11:07 pm
 Group admin 
Good news!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3VdU6jy3dc

Michael, you could not possible have the extended DOS, it will not come out until fall. Did you mean you had extended AUJ?
Permalink
| April 30, 2014, 11:11 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark Murphy
Good news!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3VdU6jy3dc

Michael, you could not possible have the extended DOS, it will not come out until fall. Did you mean you had extended AUJ?

Oh, of course!

Thanks, Mark, I'll edit my comment now...
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 5:53 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark Murphy
I agreem the last title was a lot more meaningful.

Yes, and it is much more famous and epic!
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 5:54 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark Murphy
Good news!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3VdU6jy3dc

Michael, you could not possible have the extended DOS, it will not come out until fall. Did you mean you had extended AUJ?

The scene where Bombur falls into the river will also be in the movie!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QSol8O6-bLo/URsWot5Ff6I/AAAAAPhY/Ly-fwoq76ew/s1600/737192_516547531700158_664764974_o.jpg
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 6:07 am
Quoting Mark Murphy
Good news!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3VdU6jy3dc

Michael, you could not possible have the extended DOS, it will not come out until fall. Did you mean you had extended AUJ?

OOH! I hope they add all those scenes except Azog...No, Gollum shouldn't be there but Andy Serkis does such a great job with the character that I want to see more of him.
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 9:54 am
Quoting Michael Kringe
The scene where Bombur falls into the river will also be in the movie!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QSol8O6-bLo/URsWot5Ff6I/AAAAAPhY/Ly-fwoq76ew/s1600/737192_516547531700158_664764974_o.jpg

YES!! I love the parts in Mirkwood in the book so I'm glad they'll be extending that and hopefully Beorn's house.
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 9:56 am
Great work! How does it only shoot one rubber band at a time?

Quoting jack noel

i code make it beder

Correcting your spelling. I COULD (Not code.) make it BETTER. (Not beder) Replying to your spelling. That is rude.
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 11:14 am
Quoting Wolverine .
Correcting your spelling. I COULD (Not code.) make it BETTER. (Not beder) Replying to your spelling. That is rude.

Hahahahehheh....
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 11:15 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting Mark Murphy
What!? I loved the goblin town song! It was my favorite added scene, because it was one of the only things they added that was in the book.

I didn't mind the one in the original version, but the extended one was too long and weird. I guess I should read the book again...
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 4:39 pm
 Group moderator 
Quoting Michael Kringe
The scene where Bombur falls into the river will also be in the movie!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QSol8O6-bLo/URsWot5Ff6I/AAAAAPhY/Ly-fwoq76ew/s1600/737192_516547531700158_664764974_o.jpg

The link doesn't work! D:
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 4:45 pm
Quoting David .
I didn't mind the one in the original version, but the extended one was too long and weird. I guess I should read the book again...

Yeah, the song was too weird. Personally, I like this one better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogTDa-vG2MQ. I'm dead serious. I love this one so much better.
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 7:49 pm
Quoting Michael Kringe
The scene where Bombur falls into the river will also be in the movie!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QSol8O6-bLo/URsWot5Ff6I/AAAAAPhY/Ly-fwoq76ew/s1600/737192_516547531700158_664764974_o.jpg

YAY! Too bad the link doesn't work, though.
Permalink
| May 1, 2014, 7:50 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting Evan Botkin
OOH! I hope they add all those scenes except Azog...No, Gollum shouldn't be there but Andy Serkis does such a great job with the character that I want to see more of him.

Yes, he played the best CGI characters ever. (King Kong, LOTR, Planet of the Apes) That's why I think that maybe he'll play an alien in Star Wars Episode VII.
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 4:22 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Professor B.
Yeah, the song was too weird. Personally, I like this one better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogTDa-vG2MQ. I'm dead serious. I love this one so much better.

I agree, they had so many great scenes and the songs were simply the best.

My favorite ones are when there's a whip there's a way and this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-_r1Npsv5I
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 4:27 am
 Group admin 
Quoting David .
The link doesn't work! D:

This one should work...

http://www-images.theonering.org/torwp/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Bombur-sleeping-copy-1024x629.jpg
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 4:29 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Wolverine .
Correcting your spelling. I COULD (Not code.) make it BETTER. (Not beder) Replying to your spelling. That is rude.

Who is jack noel? I can't see any comments of him in this topic...
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 4:31 am
Quoting Michael Kringe
Yes, he played the best CGI characters ever. (King Kong, LOTR, Planet of the Apes) That's why I think that maybe he'll play an alien in Star Wars Episode VII.

Yeah I haven't seen King Kong in ages and I've never seen Planet of the Apes but it would be really cool if he played a main character alien.
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 8:35 am

Hehe. I wonder if he'll say anything.
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 12:44 pm
 Group moderator 

Hahahah! XD

I hope he gets a line when Bilbo takes guard duty for him... (I hope it's in there at all)
Permalink
| May 2, 2014, 4:34 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting David .
Hahahah! XD

I hope he gets a line when Bilbo takes guard duty for him... (I hope it's in there at all)

Yes, in opposite to most of the other dwarves he had so many quotes in the book, so WHY... WHY aren't they in the movie???
Permalink
| May 3, 2014, 6:20 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting Michael Kringe
Yes, in opposite to most of the other dwarves he had so many quotes in the book, so WHY... WHY aren't they in the movie???

Maybe they want his revealing line to be noticed, because he's a very important character? (in the book?) So they want it to be a very serious, important scene? I really really really hope they give him a line...
Permalink
| May 3, 2014, 10:59 am
 Group admin 
Quoting David .
Maybe they want his revealing line to be noticed, because he's a very important character? (in the book?) So they want it to be a very serious, important scene? I really really really hope they give him a line...

Me too. But I doubt that they will do so... Some dwarves in the Hobbit movies are very disappointing. Dori for instance is supposed to be the strongest and the bravest of the dwarves, but in the movie he behaves more like an old upperclass lady. And Bifur just can't be taken serious, in the movie he's just the guy who makes weird noises and can't talk. Gloin should also have more lines since he is Gimli's father. The only dwarves I am happy about are Balin, Dwalin, Kili, Fili and especially Bofur. In the book he is just one of 13 dwarves and in the movie he's one of my favorite characters!
Permalink
| May 4, 2014, 5:16 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Michael Kringe
Yes, in opposite to most of the other dwarves he had so many quotes in the book, so WHY... WHY aren't they in the movie???

I have been asking that for a long time.
Permalink
| May 4, 2014, 9:20 am
Well, I try not to get too hung up on the changes/deviations from the book. If I do, I won't enjoy the film. Royd Tolkien said it best and I paraphrase, "There is always the book if you want the story in it's purest form." I've really enjoyed both films so far and the LotR films. All five have quite a few changes, but they are all great movies. I'm super pumped for BotFA.
Permalink
| May 4, 2014, 11:55 pm
Oh, the only change in all the LotR and Hobbit films so far that I can't stand is that Tauriel and Kili healing/love scene in Laketown. It was absolutely BRUTAL (the acting too) and totally contradicted the book. There is no way that they knew what Kings-foil was and Tauriel was not an elven healer. It was impossible.
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 12:00 am
Quoting Mark McPeek
Oh, the only change in all the LotR and Hobbit films so far that I can't stand is that Tauriel and Kili healing/love scene in Laketown. It was absolutely BRUTAL (the acting too) and totally contradicted the book. There is no way that they knew what Kings-foil was and Tauriel was not an elven healer. It was impossible.

Ha ha! Totally with you on that whole healing episode… Probably the only other deviation that bothered me was when they melt the golden Thror. It seemed rather, farfetched...
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 7:37 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark McPeek
Well, I try not to get too hung up on the changes/deviations from the book. If I do, I won't enjoy the film. Royd Tolkien said it best and I paraphrase, "There is always the book if you want the story in it's purest form." I've really enjoyed both films so far and the LotR films. All five have quite a few changes, but they are all great movies. I'm super pumped for BotFA.

Yes, if we look at movie and book as seperate things, the movie ist still very good. As for Tauriel and Kili, I liked the love-scenes and I'm sure that every viewer knows that it isn't in the book (Or so I hope). All in all I think DOS is a good movie, but there is not much left anymore of the innocent and fantastic children's novel The Hobbit.
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 7:56 am
 Group admin 
Quoting T. J. Pownell
Ha ha! Totally with you on that whole healing episode… Probably the only other deviation that bothered me was when they melt the golden Thror. It seemed rather, farfetched...

Yes, the whole fight in the Lonely Mountain looked like it was made for a cheap video game.
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 7:58 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Mark Murphy
I have been asking that for a long time.

Yeah, definitely one of the most disappointing changes.
At least his look is dwarfish enough. (Not like Kili's)
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 7:59 am
Quoting Mark McPeek
Oh, the only change in all the LotR and Hobbit films so far that I can't stand is that Tauriel and Kili healing/love scene in Laketown. It was absolutely BRUTAL (the acting too) and totally contradicted the book. There is no way that they knew what Kings-foil was and Tauriel was not an elven healer. It was impossible.

Yeah, that part was... not so good (saying it in the nicest way possible).
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 6:21 pm
Quoting Michael Kringe
Yes, if we look at movie and book as seperate things, the movie ist still very good. As for Tauriel and Kili, I liked the love-scenes and I'm sure that every viewer knows that it isn't in the book (Or so I hope). All in all I think DOS is a good movie, but there is not much left anymore of the innocent and fantastic children's novel The Hobbit.

I'll agree with you on the children's novel.

Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 11:55 pm
Quoting T. J. Pownell
Ha ha! Totally with you on that whole healing episode… Probably the only other deviation that bothered me was when they melt the golden Thror. It seemed rather, farfetched...

Yeah, it did. They could have just had a big fight with Smaug outside the mountain. That would have been closer to the book. Nevertheless, it was awesome!
Permalink
| May 5, 2014, 11:56 pm
Quoting Mark McPeek
Yeah, it did. They could have just had a big fight with Smaug outside the mountain. That would have been closer to the book. Nevertheless, it was awesome!

Yeah, due to the outstanding special effects, the part was still really cool.
Permalink
| May 6, 2014, 7:48 am
 Group admin 
Quoting T. J. Pownell
Yeah, due to the outstanding special effects, the part was still really cool.

I think the people who didn't read the book liked the invented scenes a lot better...
Permalink
| May 7, 2014, 4:29 am
Quoting Michael Kringe
Yes, the whole fight in the Lonely Mountain looked like it was made for a cheap video game.

In fact, nearly every action scene did.
Permalink
| May 7, 2014, 4:36 am
 Group admin 
Quoting Stephen Boe
In fact, nearly every action scene did.

Yes, right from the beginning. The bunny-sleigh scene, the barrel-scene, the Smaug-scene the Goblins in Goblin-town, Beorn chasing the dwarves, Gandalf vs Sauron, Bolg vs Legolas and orcs in Lake-town and of course Azog.
Permalink
| May 8, 2014, 6:10 am
Other topics
2400 members! Updated today
2000 Vignettes Updated Saturday



LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop The Fellowship of the BrickLord of the Rings


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use