MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop Revelation Assembly 05: Dai Nova Zero [Phong-Style]Mecha
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
Revelation Assembly 05: Dai Nova Zero [Phong-Style]
Man I'm building quickly lately! This mecha took about 5 hours to complete. [I was searching for a 4th wheelhub for like an hour, but then I looked at my box and realized I only had 3!! I was pretty annoyed. Why is it that I always have an odd number of the right part!?] This mecha was built with EXTREMELY limited parts supply, so I had to put more blue parts in, but I think it turned out O.K.
About this creation
The background to Dai Nova's construction
Phong-Style isn't only made for jagged mechas. It can be used to make round mechas too. This mecha is again 100% Phong-Style other than the Izzo-Style elbow and knee joints. I also decided to take apart the Shin Ganmen for its gun. I like the unique design I gave to this mecha. It's got greebly joint areas as well as the abdomin while still keeping stylish armor. [Stylish?! For lack of a better word.] I also decided to make downward facing knee pads for a change. More underarmor is shown too. I like how I kept the feet simple yet effective. The goal was to make them look sorta like socks because I thought it was a new idea and looked cool. This mecha's frame was made up of much of the Bayonet's frame. The color placement was designed in a slightly new way: The blay is the underarmor, the gray is the joints/greebles, the white is the overall base color for the outer armor, and the blue/trans-blue are the accents/glowy parts.

Story
The Dai Nova is another God-sent mecha used by the Salvation's pilot's brother.
He too can control time and space in the same way as the his bro. The mechas are used to magnify those powers to a divine level, and can only be piloted by their chosen person unless under certain circumstance. They become somewhat "part" of the pilots. This mecha May not be as strong as the Salvation with it's melee, but it's much faster! It also has a gun arm to replace the left arm. While the Crossfire blast may not have as wide a blast radius as the Salvation's Divine Spirit blast, the Crossfire shoots so rapidly that it can give the illusion of being a virtually limitless-lengthed blade! The attack is also much more focused than Divine Spirit, so it can do much more damage to it's immediate target rather than the whole area it's being fired in. [unlike how the highly charged Divine Spirit blast damaged the Revelation and destroed the alternate universe he was fighting in.] Well enjoy the mecha!

IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZUH!!!


How the Dai Nova takes out a large group of enemies....the cool way!
First he kicks one enemy into it's ally.....


.... then, as he lands he launches his Crossfire attack at that enemy.....


...then gets low to the ground and ready to spin.....


...then busts out multiple spot on accurate shots while spinning on one hand!!!


....and finally finishes off his last opponent with a good laugh by striking them with his funny bone!


How Dai Nova FIRES HIS LAZUH!!!![Crossfire]
Loads his gun...


Aims...and blows his load! (That's what she said! LOL!) The attack is called Crossfire. Get it! I kill me!


Lets the smoke from his gun clear in a heroic fasion.


Oooh, new head design! (I've been itching to use that lever base as a visor.)


WOOT!!! One armed handstand again!!! (This was done on a wobbly matress, so that shows insane stability!)


SLight close-up on the mechas arm:


Close-up on hand:


The views:










Group shot. The Bayonet was dissassembled yesterday to make this.


I am too lazy to post this mecha's frame, so I'll post the Bayonet's frame due to the simlarities. It should give you a good idea of how the Dai Nova is built. [These pics were taken during the Bayonet's dissasembly.]









Comments

 I like it 
  July 26, 2012
How many of those 1x1's with studs on all sides did you use?
 I like it 
  July 26, 2012
This is great! Can I use that frame in one of my mecha later? I promise to give credit to you.
Phong Chang
 I like it 
Nathan Schock
  November 28, 2010
I share your annoyance with having an odd number of a crucial part. Love the mech though. :)
Phong Chang
 I like it 
ontopovamountain perry
  November 28, 2010
now, where have i seen this moc before.. oh, thats right, its one of the most popular images when the word MECHA is typed into google pics, grats on motd
 I like it 
  November 28, 2010
Congrats on MOTD! Nice system of joints; the level of detail and the combination of stability and posability make this a great mech. Very nicely built!
 I like it 
  November 28, 2010
There's a reason I love your mechs. Oh, and what's that thing between its...?
 I like it 
  November 28, 2010
Awome! SO COOL!!! 10 out of 5 stars, chick out my creations please!
 I like it 
  November 28, 2010
Very cool. I've seen a lot of mecha's in a similar style, but this is a great one. And I gotta say, I love all the ability it has.
 I like it 
  November 28, 2010
Excellent frame design.. congrats on MOTD!
  November 28, 2010
If I would comment to every gained comment on my moc's too I would have had so many MOTD's as well.
 I like it 
  October 23, 2010
ARGH! i wish that i could build a good mech like this!!! ive been wanting to for the longest time!!!! BTW this is great!
 I like it 
  June 4, 2010
great work can you check out my mechs? they r all zoids but worth seeing.
 I like it 
  March 30, 2010
make instructions plz if not of the whole thing than just the base that would help me out much cuz im not good at really making these things on my own without a hint
Phong Chang
CONOR HAS THE NEED FOR SPEED
  September 1, 2009
ewy its got SOME THING CHILDISH! hahaha great mecha thing!congrats on MOTD!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
LOL! You've probably set a record for the most MOTD's, you know. (what a scary thought) I'm gonna slam my face into the keyboard now. w3kjehfzekfsvds HDJFljefdxj
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Congrats on MOTD, not that you needed the fame ;)
  September 1, 2009
I just knew this was yours when I saw the frontpage! Congratz on your MOTD! You really deserved it. I'm adding you to my favorite builders (I thought I already had you). Ow nvm, I wasn't logged in when I saw that >.> ~M
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Amazing!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
that first one sure looks like a boy.lol.jk.really like work.very flexible looking.really cool
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Is this based off of Neon Genesis Evangelion?
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Gratz for MOTD!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Sick! And congrats on MOTD!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Sick! And congrats on MOTD!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Sick! And congrats on MOTD!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
congrats , one of my favorite buildiners inspireing me to build mechs with extreme ness
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
congrats , one of my favorite buildiners inspireing me to build mechs with extreme ness
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Congrats on the MOTD Phong!
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
Congrats on MOTD Phong (again). 8^)
 I like it 
  September 1, 2009
These things definitely deserve MOTD! Great work, and congrats. You are one of the best mech builders to hit this site!
 I like it 
  June 29, 2009
Very cool. In fact so cool, that it gave me inspiration to test my own skills at mecha building. You can see the result here: http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/131405
 I like it 
  June 26, 2009
Wow. It's amazing. And that's for the advice for the camera. The pic look nice now.
 I like it 
  June 15, 2009
WOW!! i wish i had a big enough variety of new lego pieces to make cool lego mechas like this! would you mind commenting on my mech i will post later? thx...
 I like it 
  June 15, 2009
Very well done. It looks great. I especially like the knees and the elbows.
 I like it 
  June 12, 2009
hey man. I loved every1 of ur creations. They r awsome. Hey have u got msn ? can i add u? And do u still have some old lego gundam u dont want. Cause i would love to buy them , and just to say ur lego gundam r abslute rule this website. I reckon u should open a private shop just to sell u could earn a fortune with ur skills.
 I like it 
  June 12, 2009
You simply rock with your mechas! This one is in your top three! Great work!
Phong Chang
 I like it 
Heather LEGOgirl
  June 10, 2009
Wow! Not only is your Mech awesome but your photos are top notch as well. No wonder you've gotten MOTD 8 times!!! That's exactly 8 more than me. :) Keep It Studly Sir!
 I like it 
  June 9, 2009
I was looking for a good frame to start my mech! btw, waiting the pieces to come!
 I like it 
  June 9, 2009
Meooooow!
 I like it 
  June 7, 2009
Chat NAO plzthx. BTW: You get your Xbox Live working again?
 I like it 
  June 7, 2009
Chat NAO! Plz, thnkx.
 I like it 
  June 7, 2009
Do you think that should redo the mini proCRESTinator? I think it looks weird.
 I like it 
  June 7, 2009
Man, very excellent work. I just don´t like the feet, but the rest is great!!! Visit http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/120470
 I like it 
  June 7, 2009
Chat Nao plz thx.
  June 6, 2009
Phong, Mocpages is being stupid and wont let me upload my original comment, but basically I do know what I'm talking about. I have learned over the past few weeks that I don't need comments, and that my mocs should just speak for themselves. I was just trying to help, and I don't think I looked like an idiot at all. I hope you can respect that i was just trying to help and meant no harm at all. Oh, and what do you think about me trying to make some bad guys for you?
  June 6, 2009
u know dali says u copy izzo... well if u look at dali's venus savage it looks a lot like this http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=3266144 but on the discription it says inspired by squieu and phongs izzo styles say inspired by izzo yoshi soooo... yeah but iam not sure how relivant this comment is....
  June 6, 2009
I agree with mithryl... basically my same point.
  June 6, 2009
Phong, I do know what I'm talking about, and you don't need to get nasty with me. I was just trying to help, and I hope you can repesct that. Over the past few weeks, since I made that comment on one of your mocs, I have realized that i don't need comments, I just need to build. I hope you can understand that, and mithryl (or however u spell it) said what I was going to say perfectly. His comment about building on each others ideas is what I think comments were made for (and aso why I created the group "Moc Help"). I'm glad that this is resolved. Have you considered my offer to build bad guys for u? And I would like to join flickr too, but I dont know anything about it... (P.S., got anything for Moc Help? I really want to get this group going so people can help each other without all the off-topic comments.)
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting mithryl dlarix Probably I would. Text can be incredibly tricky, can it not? I'll settle for a draw as well. Please forgive me my intemperate words. I am truly a great fan of yours, and always look forward to your next creation more eagrely than the last. Okay, let me put what I'm saying in this sort of context: Its a lot easier for your visitors to give you good input, if there is less irrellevant stuff clogging up the comments area. For instance: Lets say that I saw something I really liked on your mech, or something that could be improved, but I didn't want to bother you by pointing out something that someone else had pointed out already (because that gets repetitive and annoying sometimes). If there is no clutter, then I can easily scan down and see if someone had already pointed it out, right? Also, if there are more, on topic posts, then people can build on each other's suggestions, thus improving the quality of feedback you get. Its of benefit to you and your visitors. What say you?
It's all cool. PS: I'm gonna join Flickr. How bout you? I'm not leaving the 'Pages though.
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
I know I'm not immune to being wrong, I just don't think I'm wrong here. Neither are you. Both of us are on equal grounds in this debate. Also, I feel the need to defend myself because I don't enjoy being accused of something false, especially over such trivial matters such as my number of comments. If someone brings up something so insignificant, of course I'm gonna respond. I know it's a sign of self doubt, but I don't want to be viewed in the wrong way. It's human nature to have that emotion. So of course I'll argue back. You're percieving me as if I'm just arguing back to prevent loss in an argument rather than stick up for what I feel to be the truth. Am I right? I never went on the offensive at your criticism. I never expected you to take it that way. Though I did get a little flustered at the fact that you even brought up something so minor and decided to argue with me about it. I guess I'm not the type of person who can just shrug and walk away, but that doesn't mean I desire to always be right. I know where you got the arrogance vs self-confidence thing, but that conversation had nothing to do with arguing. I was stating to Will that it's OK to call yourself great if you're not rude about it. That's the line between arrogance in self-confidence. So to answer your statement, I don't cover up my self-doubt with arrogance and convince myself that it's self-confidence. I'm not arrogant at all. Arrogance would just add to my self-doubt by the simple knowledge of a personality deffect if I was so self-doubting. My self-confidence comes from knowing I'm right, not from arrogance used to conceal self-doubt. If you knew me in real life you'd understand that.
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
I'm not saying that I have absolutely no self-doubt. Being human, I'm bound to have some. What I percieved as insults weren't chosen to be so. I just saw how the comment was put together and assumed that you were insulting me. Sorry 'bout that. However, I didn't percieve it that way to get out of admitting my mistakes. I percieved it that way because I genuinely thought it was somewhat insulting. I can take criticism. Don't doubt that for a second. :) You have some really good points, but they don't apply to me or my personality. I appreciate your concern, but I'm not the type of guy you're percieving me to be. :)
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Ah, mithryl, mithryl. I'm assured of my own infaiLability do to the fact that my MOCs do have a lot of on-topic comments. Im aware and always have been of the fact that people do leave tons of off-topic comments, but there are still many who don't. Notice how Dali never re-rated during our argument. Half the time when people get off topic, it's without my consent. Why does that even matter so long the MOC itself is good. Comments aren't the world, but I enjoy them. Either way, I still get more on-topic comments than you do. I know it isn't a competition, but for you to come barging in here insulting me about something as insignificant as the ammount of comments I get is absurd. And yes, I get that this page has turned into a forum, but I'm too lazy to move the argument elseware. Plus, even if you quote 100 off topic comments, I can quote 100 more on topic comments. Be a bit more optimistic. Look at the glass half full. Or don't even really pay attention to the number of comment, because it's only text. The MOC itself is what you need to pay attention to. BTW: I can triple this conversation size with on-topic quotes, so don't think that you've proven a point of something I'm not aware of. As a matter of fact, I can care less.
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting Ryan T. M. head down to my chatroom: http://www.chatmaker.net/chatap/rooms/Ryans%20Ultimate%20Chatroom/
CODY G JOIN THE CHATROOOM!!!!
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting mithryl dlarix No, I meant going back to the...what was it? The God mech? Holiest of holies? the holy moly? Oh yeah, the original Salvation--before it underwent, I don't know how many revisions (how many times did you repost it to milk it for new comments, phong?)
I didn't milk it for new comments. I posted different versions to show changes rather than edit old pages. I'm used to just posting pages. Don't accuse me of comment milking when you have no idea if that assumption is even accurate.
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting Ryan T. M. well ya.... and... tablescraps... some of them have alot of random conversation... dai shin.... and salvation tend to not have all the junk cuz its way better
Are the Tablescraps recent MOCs though? No. The thing is, Mythril and I mean recent MOCs.
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
well ya.... and... tablescraps... some of them have alot of random conversation... dai shin.... and salvation tend to not have all the junk cuz its way better
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting Ryan T. M. u see knoll re-rated it giving u 1 extra point... he was asking u to get on chatroom oh and i just re-rated
I'm aware of that.
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting Ryan T. M. actually mithryls right... cuz most people who re-comment tend to also re-rate.. yes u can rate a 2nd time and it DOES count... so u should have more like 30-50 "likes" not 70 something... which 30-50 is still incredible... so in the end phong is incredible popular still :D but not as much as u think :|
It's only on this MOC ryan. Look at the Salvation, Dai Shin Lee, etc.
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
u see knoll re-rated it giving u 1 extra point... he was asking u to get on chatroom oh and i just re-rated
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting mithryl dlarix *Shrugs* If you say so...Man--you are really spoiling for arguments, aren't you?
I have no idea what you mean by that above comment, but saying "most of my recent MOCs" when in reality, it's just this one is absurd. I'm in the argument with Dali because he was talking bad about me behind my back, so of course it'll go a long ways.
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
actually mithryls right... cuz most people who re-comment tend to also re-rate.. yes u can rate a 2nd time and it DOES count... so u should have more like 30-50 "likes" not 70 something... which 30-50 is still incredible... so in the end phong is incredible popular still :D but not as much as u think :|
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting mithryl dlarix I've noticed something about most of your latest MOCs. You only get about 5-10 comments on the actual MOC. After that, it turns into either an argument, or you telling people to go on X-Box Live, or chat or about how awesome TTGL is or about how you are not arrogant. But there is very little discussion about the actual MOC after awhile. So, while it looks like you get a lot of comments, you actually don't if you strip all the irrellevant stuff away. Did anyone else notice this?
Actually Mythril, that's not true. I get tons of comments even before hand, but it's only this MOC that's the arguement. Look at "see who likes this creation."
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
Go on chatroom, NAO! It's important! http://www.chatmaker.net/chatap/rooms/Pervish%20Junk/
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
I like the upper leg parts and the abdomen. This is an amazing series :)
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
phong all the way! dalis being slightly rude me thinks
  June 6, 2009
xbox ftw now get on phong chang nao
  June 6, 2009
get on xbl
  June 6, 2009
xbox live nao
  June 6, 2009
phong get on xbox live
  June 6, 2009
phong if ur online get on xbox live
 I like it 
  June 6, 2009
Phong, to the chat room NAO
 I made it 
  June 6, 2009
Quoting Zach Baker Phong, I think dali's point is that you need to grow up a little. Dali doesn't go around asking for people to rate his stuff, yet he still gets a lot of people to rate/comment. Thats because people like his stuff. just let your building speak for you, and in the end, if your happy with what you build, it really doesn't matter how many views or comments you get.
I don't ask for comments; I only used to back in my nuub days, Zach. People do just come in and rate my stuff. Notice how I get mass numbers of comments. I don't go around asking random people for comments. That would be a huge waste of time. I'm too lazy and good for that. My building does speak for me. The only people I do advertise to are my own friends, and I only tell my friends because I like to keep them updated. I know they would still comment regardless, but when they're offline for a long time, I tell them what they missed. I haven't solicited for comments since last year. I grew out of comment soliciting a long time ago. You need to read the full argument if you're going to make a remark. The argument is about if I do solicit now, which I don't. You don't know what you're talking about Zach. This argument is about how Dali is accusing me of being an attention-hore NOW, when I'm not. I used to be a LONG time ago, but I admit to that. For him to accuse me of still being that is just absurd. Infact, I spent about 2 hours searching through "comments I've made" just to see if I could find where Dali got such an idea. Sure enough, I found none.
  June 5, 2009
people will think what they want. you keep thinking you're winning, I'll keep thinking you're acting noobish.
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
sup phongy
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
How come you don't wanna build any AC's?
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Preorder ODST!!!
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Meh it's ok, but like I said anime isn't my favorite.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Thomas Andrews NO Rickroll!!!
How do you like TTGL so far?
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
NO Rickroll!!!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Thomas Andrews NO CLICKY IT"S A TRAP!!!
What?!
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
NO CLICKY IT"S A TRAP!!!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Andreas Höttler Uhm, I´m not sure if I wanted to help...actually I just wanted to say my little comment to this. However, yes Fed and I had, or better still have this arguement and I as far as I can say that it´s better that that friendship is over now... Who cares at all. Don´t argue too much, you both are really good and I don´t think you really have to discuss about details or even to diccuss about the discussion itself. Thats nonsense isn´t it?
Yeah, but I care if Dali and I aren't friends. We started out as really good friends. [Actually he started out as a fan of mine, but he improved and we talked more and became friends.] Plus we have the same humor which is very unique. Don't ask. I also gave him a lot of info on that girl, so yeah. Still Dali and I have argued our fair share, but we're still friends. You and Fed should be too.
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Good return to what Dali said. kick impossible to the curb
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Thomas Andrews good one Phong!!!
Good what?
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
good one Phong!!!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng you're never going to win an argument online. it's just not possible!
Well then I just went "beyond the impossible and kicked reason to the curb!"
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Andreas Höttler Difficult to say who has won, Dali´s Will-style is better than your stuff Phong, although Phong has a point, too. My suggestion, Phong returns to his other favorite activity (you should know what I mean Phong) and Dali drinks a bit and creates a new crazy Venus Collective Mech. What do you think of that? You both would be happy and I wouldn´t get all the messages saying that Phong Chang commented on (...).
Andreas, you're basically saying that Dali's style of making up false accusitions of me then copping out in the end [exact Will-Style.] is better than my honest and well supported argumental style. The thing is, Dali was, and hopefully still is a good friend of mine, but I just want to get him to understand that I'm telling the truth and accept that I've won. I don't want to be portrayed as an attention-hore, nuub, and a bad arguer, because those are all things that I'm not. But most of all, I don't want to be accused of lying when I'm a VERY honest guy. Especially by my own friend. I still wanna go back to having good times, but I also really want to get my point through Dali's head.
  June 5, 2009
you're never going to win an argument online. it's just not possible!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng Dude, I won already. You're obviously mad enough to write that much. To be honest I didn't read all that, I just saw that you wrote a lot. At this point, anything I say will just make you madder, so I win.
So you think the idea of victory is to make me mad? LOL! To be honest, I'm not mad, I'm just in the zone. I did get some good laughs out of yor responses. I honestly think though, that you're trying to act like your only point was to get me mad as a way for you to avoid loss in an argument. I'll trust what you tell me though, so answer me that question. If you can make a good answer, I'll believe you. However, I'm still your friend, but when I argue, I tend to write A LOT! Now seriously, let's settle this argument how it should be. Read all of my comments and try saying that you've won. Seriously though, you really should just admit that I've won the argument. O_o
  June 5, 2009
Dude, I won already. You're obviously mad enough to write that much. To be honest I didn't read all that, I just saw that you wrote a lot. At this point, anything I say will just make you madder, so I win.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng your argument consists of ad hominem attacks which only makes you look childish. keep on thinking you're winning, kid.
And your argument consists of zero evidence plus attacks on my maturity. Oh the irony! Anyway, you went on talking bad about me behind my back, especially to someone like Will Thomas, and accuse me of being a "kid?" You mind explaining where such a bright idea came from especially after losing to an "argumental faiIure/nuub?" What you're possibly thinking: "Oh where could Phong have come up with the idea that he's won?" My answer: Perhaps it's just the fact that I've had solid evidence to support my argument while you've had no evidence and your argument is falling apart...but that's ONLY my theory. [sarcasm] C'mon, after reading such absurd statements come from you, of course I'm gonna use some sarcasm. Have you even read my full responses at all, or are you trying to make statements based off of insignificant bits and pieces of my argument then pass off some some thoughtless and off topic statement as your response? Are you even reading my responses at all?! I'm seriously baffled at where you got the idea that your mindless little response was going to help your cause at all. I actually laghed when I saw it! After that, for you to think you've won is just a big joke to me. Of course, I'm gonna respond to it but really Dali? What the brick?! LOL! Seriously, Re-read that response that you accused of being consisted of "attacks" and also read the two mew comments.
  June 5, 2009
Phong preorder Halo 3 ODST. I wanna beat you in firefight. http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link=Halo3ODST_Firefight
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
hey Dali! one thing i ike about Phong is he doesn't go on saying WHAT YOU THINK THIS IS GREAT,START OVER?! Phong helps us improve unlike you....and if your sittin there on your pink carpet going who the h--l is this guy i'm Meanvirus!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng your argument consists of ad hominem attacks which only makes you look childish. keep on thinking you're winning, kid.
When did I attack you? I told you to quit acting like Will, but I was serious, not trying to attack. Plus, you didn't even make a response! You've simply been telling me that I'm not winning, with no support to back that up. I just made a huge response that I doubt you took into consideration or even fully read to begin with. It's blanetly obvious that I've won. I have those responses as support. If I was really such an attention-craving nub, I would have asked more people I didn't know other than the guy with the "comment here and get a comment" page for comments. If you really think that your so called "evidence" was legit, you have some serious problems understanding obvious joking and sarcasm. C'mon. Just look at how they're phrased. Plus they're on the pages of friends/acquaintances, who I said I still do advertise pages to. I do that because they're friends or people I'm sure wouldn't mind. That's not nuby. It's like how you go around posting links to your blogged pages to friends. Also, if I really did care SOOO MUCH about attention and found out it was wrong, I would simply change my ways and agree. [NOW READ PART 2.]
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
However, I don't, and I'm not about to admit to something false. I wouldn't continue this argument otherwise. All I'm trying to do is get you to see the real truth. Why is it so hard for you to believe that I'm being honest? Quite frankly, based on the lack of any real evidence you have, there is no reason not to believe me. You've only found 3 things against me, but they still weren't even legitimate. Based on how much you probably searched and the lack of evidence found, doesn't that in itself prove you wrong? Why do you insist on not believing me when I'm obviously telling the truth? You have found zero good reasons to believe that I'm what you say I am. The only reason you do have is your own imagination of how I've been acting. That's really just absurd! After finding no solid evidence in your favor, what good reason do you have to think you've won? I've had plenty of evidence to have the right to believe I've won. After all of that PLUS the fact that we're friends, why wouldn't you trust me? [Sorry to pull the friendship card.] I wouldn't have made up any excuses to your faulty evidence if they weren't false, ESPECIALLY after knowing that you would tell me that they're just excuses. The simple thought that I would even cop out is absurd, but to think I copped out using a very s+up|d and weak excuse is even more absurd. I'm a man of my word and I'm not s+up|d. Isn't that enough validation? Really Dali, KNOW I've won. It's sad that you don't.
  June 5, 2009
dali a kid seriously? Funny because your humor with will thomas seemed pretty imature in my part
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Just out of curiosity...how old are you both? :D (better than any soap ^^)
  June 5, 2009
your argument consists of ad hominem attacks which only makes you look childish. keep on thinking you're winning, kid.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng dude, I just showed you the evidence and you give BS reasons defending yourself. It's obvious that sometimes you don't even bother to review MOCs and that you comment talking about your own MOCs and refer to your own stuff consistently. That's just the facts. I don't like your comment spam on my MOCs, either.
I still can't believe you haven't come to terms with your own loss. Is it because you have something to prove after telling me I argue like a nub? I won't judge you for it. We're still friends, but I don't appreciate you talking about me behind my back. Especially to Will Thomas. NOW READ THE ACTUAL COMMENT RESPONSE BELOW:
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Dali, you're 10000% wrong! I commented on their MOCs before even telling them about mine. They were in past reviews. I just made new reviews later on rather than editing old ones. It's just like what I do on your page. Look it up and get your facts straight. Plus, The "BS reasons" are infact the truth. I wouldn't tell someone "SUC|< IT!!!" or "shameless self-promotion" unless I knew the guy and was joking. Do you honestly think I'm that s+upid?! That's absolutely absurd! BTW: While I was looking through my comments, I found where you comment spammed me. I was fine with it. thats how you AND I both joked. It was very hipocritical when you came to me a few days ago and said my humor was immature when you did the same thing. [Don't deny it or make up excuses. It's fine to have that humor anyway.] The hipocracy continues on too. Now you're forbidding me to post links to my handstands and MOCs to friends while you yourself went around posting your blogs multiple times. Also, asking them to change your blog is the same as asking for comments on a specific MOC. If we can have a blog or a comment, why not on our favorite MOCs? However, I didn't care for that guy's comment, you DID care for the blog. Not that there's anything wrong with that other than the fact that you're being an absolute hipocrate. Well back about the comment spam, it was humor, but I won't do it anymore. I said that when you first told me yesterday. You're argument is becoming more faulty with each post Dali. I suggest you just accept loss. As you can see, you've underestimated me. I CAN argue up a storm when I'm in the mood. Now let's just settle this so we can talk for fun again. I hope this changes your false and VERY mislead views of me. As you can see, I'm not a nub. I only act like one for humor. So bottom line, I've won. Plain & simple.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Andreas Höttler Venus Collective v.s. Revelation,... Revelation v.s. Gospel,... Dai Nova v.s. Sabre,...during this summer...the epic Battle will begin. Nice mech BTW, nearly forgot to comment after reading all that stuff.
Thanks. And not to Dali: NO I DID NOT ASK HIM FOR THAT COMMENT, so don't even try to accuse me of it. Quit making false accusitions. You're acting like Will Thomas.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Alex Ruiz Are you in chatroom?
No, but link me. PS: Look at this ownage LOL!
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Are you in chatroom?
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
OH! it would be awesome if revalation and the venus collective were enemys o.0!
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
sorry dali i have to be on phongs side this time....and he has commented on more of my stuff then you have....soooo ummm yeah im with phong ^_^ ur still cool though dali
  June 5, 2009
dude, I just showed you the evidence and you give BS reasons defending yourself. It's obvious that sometimes you don't even bother to review MOCs and that you comment talking about your own MOCs and refer to your own stuff consistently. That's just the facts. I don't like your comment spam on my MOCs, either.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng you still go around asking people to ChEcK 0uT Y0Ur l4t3st M0C!!1! and comparing others MOCs to your own and sometimes it's not blatantly obvious. Here's some examples from comments you made on others' MOCs... "PS: I got the Salvation to 1-armed handstand!", "It seem as though you took the Sabre and made it somewhat Phong-Style.", "PS: The Salvation (edited Revelation) is now much better. Enough with my shameless self-promotion.", "SUC|< ON THAT!!!!! Salvation FTW!!!"
I don't go around saying to check out my latest MOCs. That is exclusive to my nub days or to friends/aquaintances. The thing about the handstand was directed to only friends. The time with Andreas's MOC was not to promote myself or get a comment. I was pointing out the similarity to m style. Nothing for promotion. The one you saw about the self-promotion: I was waiting for you to point out that exact one! I'd think that you'd realize that first of all Nathan and I are acquainted, and second: Do you not see the joking and sarcastic theme to that comment?! Why else would I hae straight up called it a "shameless self-promotion?" Same goes for "SUC|< ON THAT! SALVATION FTW!!" Matt and are are also acquainted and that comment was OBVIOUSLY, without dispute, a joke. Have you considered that maybe it's not blantley obvious due to the fact that it's not what you assume it is? SON!!! YOU HAZ GOTZED OWNEDZZ!!!! LOL!
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Another cool mech! I'm lovin the new armor style!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng so of course you're going to skew the evidence in your favor lol.
I'm not skewing it in my favor at all. Especially when It's obvious that I was joking. I think you're skewing.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng so of course you're going to skew the evidence in your favor lol.
I'm not skewing it in my favor at all. Especially when It's obvious that I was joking. I think you're skewing.
  June 5, 2009
so of course you're going to skew the evidence in your favor lol.
  June 5, 2009
you still go around asking people to ChEcK 0uT Y0Ur l4t3st M0C!!1! and comparing others MOCs to your own and sometimes it's not blatantly obvious. Here's some examples from comments you made on others' MOCs... "PS: I got the Salvation to 1-armed handstand!", "It seem as though you took the Sabre and made it somewhat Phong-Style.", "PS: The Salvation (edited Revelation) is now much better. Enough with my shameless self-promotion.", "SUC|< ON THAT!!!!! Salvation FTW!!!"
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Yep, after tracing over 40 pages, I'd say we're settled. I've won. Now we can go back to actually having fun rather than arguing if you admit to my victory.
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Gonna be at camp for a week, so I will not be on MOCpages for while.
 I like it 
  June 5, 2009
Gonna be at camp for a week, so I will not be on MOCpages for while.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Cody G hmm, well, I'd define winning an argument as not only proving the other wrong, but convincing them that they were wrong. if both people's opinions still differ, then the argument is not won. so what Dali says is true in a way, he's way too stubborn to actually realize he's wrong, and if, in his mind, he is not wrong, then he will continue to argue his point.
HA! HAHAHA! HAHAHAHA!! LOL! What now doggy?!
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng Do you realize that MOTD is random? Sean even said so himself.
Yes, that was sorta part of my point. Are we settled yet. I've been searching my comments for hours. It's very exhausting. I do admit I finally found ONE comment to support you on Schfio Factory's page, but him and I were sorta aquainted and I wanted his opinion, because he's an amazing builder. So you lose.
  June 5, 2009
Do you realize that MOTD is random? Sean even said so himself.
 I made it 
  June 5, 2009
Dali, I found this while searching my comments. Plus, I've yet to find a sign of any support to your argument. I win.
Quoting Dali Zheng haha yeah I saw that comment. and no, you can't keep refreshing to increase you pageviews, that doesn't work. It only counts unique visitors. My Interceptor got blogged on Young Spacers, and it's not my best work either.
I know, it's often times that you're best MOCs don't get rewarded. My Vulcan being Blogged on Young Spacers, my "Tour through my LEGOs (NOT A MOC)" page even got MOTD when it said in big bold letters, "NOT A MOC" in the title, and many other pages got MOTD weren't my best. Just be greatful for the reward you get.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng I win because Phong's mad :)
I'm not mad. We're still friends. I'm not trying to diss you or anything.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Mike 3579 Noooo! I do NOT want to get into an argument (I'm pretty bad at it).
I'm good at arguing in real life and internet. Something Dali won't admit.
  June 4, 2009
I win because Phong's mad :)
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
Noooo! I do NOT want to get into an argument (I'm pretty bad at it).
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Mike 3579 LOL you guys!!! Arguing over the internet is like winning the re+tard olympics, you may of won, but you are still re+tarded.
You wanna argue about arguing? I'll prove you wrong.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
LOL you guys!!! Arguing over the internet is like winning the re+tard olympics, you may of won, but you are still re+tarded.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Zach Baker Why do you people always have to argue? Whats the point? Why not build instead? or go on xbox? (Phong I think u deleted me. please add me again : HHO xZACHly)
Did I? Dali and I are arguing because he was talking about me behing my back and was making me look like an attention-craving nub. I'm out to prove him wrong...WHICH I DID, but he won't accept or believe it.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
Why do you people always have to argue? Whats the point? Why not build instead? or go on xbox? (Phong I think u deleted me. please add me again : HHO xZACHly)
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng dude, you already lost. just like how you lost the argument that you were imitating Izzo's style. lololololol
I didn't lose that. I can go on and say you're copying Moko, but I trust that you're being original evn though it's similar. I admit that I USED to imitate Izzo, but that was untl I created the Salvation. Then I began Phong-Style. I also said my style was similar to his before I discovered him, so our styles are bound to be alike. You didn't win that. However, if that argument was at the time when I actually did use Izzo-Style, you woulda won. However, that was made at Phong-Style. You even told my my Dai Shin Lee was Phongish. SO HA!! :-D Also, I've won this as well. I'm not an attention-craving selicitor. I'm still searching through my comments and haven't found any selicitations other than that one page and my friends' page. HA!
  June 4, 2009
dude, you already lost. just like how you lost the argument that you were imitating Izzo's style. lololololol
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng Dude, you're never going to win an argument over the internet. I want you to accept it :D
But I already have. Many times Dali. I want you to accept that I won. Maybe my opponents don't always accept it, but everyone else says I won.[not this one, nobody is commenting about it, but against Will many said I won.] I also just know based on how the arguments go down. You know, the point where it can't be proven to them due to stubborness or being a matter of trust, but you still KNOW you're right? That's also happened.
  June 4, 2009
Dude, you're never going to win an argument over the internet. I want you to accept it :D
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng you still ask for comments on your MOCs. it's not just one time. I'm not even going to look through your activity to see which MOCs you did it on, I think you already know.
Like I said, I do that to friends and aquaintances.
  June 4, 2009
you still ask for comments on your MOCs. it's not just one time. I'm not even going to look through your activity to see which MOCs you did it on, I think you already know.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng phong you're not "winning" anything at all. I'm not picking sides either. I pointed out to you a long time ago that you're going around soliciting comments and asking for people to add things to your group. and if you think you're winning, fine, I can't really change what you think. Ignorance breeds ignorance.
For crying out loud! If you were in my position you would realize how absurd that comment just was. Dali, I solicited my MOC just for the heck of it. Your argument was based on trying to make me look like I was attention-craving and that I constantly solicit my MOCs. I did it that ONE time. And that was ONLy because it said for me to. [aside from my nub days, but I admit to those.] I also only asked 3 people to join my group because their MOCs fit. It wasn't for attention or anything. I just thought they might be interested. If they didn't join, I wouldn't mind. I don't "go around soliciting for comments or asking people to join my groups." You're exaggerating the truth to support your argument and make it look reasonable, while the truth is, it's absurd and innaccurate. I pointed this out to you long ago. However, you refuse to accept it. Don't get me wrong; you were right about one thing: "Ignorance breeds ignorance." Except this time, you are the one who is suffering from ignorance.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng "It is. You wanted your VG blogged, so you asked them to change it." I'm not changing the subject. I'm still talking about this. I didn't ask for them to blog me. That is fact. I asked for them to change what they blogged, which is completely different.
That's still asking for attention by your standards. However, I believe you that you weren't trying to get attention, so why can't you believe me? Our situations are similar. You could get blogged, so why not your VG: I could get a comment, so why not my Salvation. How do you not see the connection? Either way, that was an example to support my argument, not to attack you. I'm just trying to convince you that our intentions are the same and that I'm not an attention-craving comment needer. I really didn't care whether or not he commented, but if he did, why not my Salvation? That's all it was. I really didn't care though. Why is that so hard to believe? Why do you insist on looking at me in a negative perspective?
  June 4, 2009
phong you're not "winning" anything at all. I'm not picking sides either. I pointed out to you a long time ago that you're going around soliciting comments and asking for people to add things to your group. and if you think you're winning, fine, I can't really change what you think. Ignorance breeds ignorance.
  June 4, 2009
"It is. You wanted your VG blogged, so you asked them to change it." I'm not changing the subject. I'm still talking about this. I didn't ask for them to blog me. That is fact. I asked for them to change what they blogged, which is completely different.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng dude, you haven't won anything. you just think you're "winning." The fact is, I didn't ask for anyone to blog my creations. I only asked someone to change one of my creations which they blogged.
That's not the argument, plus I did win. I was just stating your hipocracy as detail. Get back on subject, I don't beg for comments and I didn't ask the guy for attention. I really don't care. If I truly cared, wouldn't I be asking him to comment on my new MOCs?
  June 4, 2009
dude, you haven't won anything. you just think you're "winning." The fact is, I didn't ask for anyone to blog my creations. I only asked someone to change one of my creations which they blogged.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng They blogged Venus Savage without me knowing it. I had to Google it to find out. After realizing that they had blogged me, I asked them to change it to Venus Gospel. That's not asking for people to blog me, that's asking for them to change what they blogged.
It is. You wanted your VG blogged, so you asked them to change it. There's nothing wrong with that though. It's like how I had that guy with the "comment here and get one" page comment on my Salvation instead of my older MOCs. Since I can have a comment why not on my cool MOC? Just like you. Since you can have a blog, why not on your favorite MOC? Face it Dali, I've won. Your argument is moot. I think you know it too.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
I know for a fact that I wasn't being some attention-craving nubcake. My argument is based off of facts, while your's and Will's are based off of assumptions and innaccurate perspectives of my intentions. I guess I might not be able to prove myself, but this is something you just have to trust me on because only I know my true intentions while you only assume the bad. Besides, you're a friend, so you should trust me. Don't side with Will Thomas. He's very biased and two-faced. He'd bound to say something bad about me. My point being, he's exaggerating or making up random assumptions based off of his negativity to me. Why trust that? I've known the guy longer than you have. I know how he is.
  June 4, 2009
They blogged Venus Savage without me knowing it. I had to Google it to find out. After realizing that they had blogged me, I asked them to change it to Venus Gospel. That's not asking for people to blog me, that's asking for them to change what they blogged.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
I never begged Dali, and it isn't a pattern either. And Will, I don't "need" comments. Why is it so hard to believe that I just asked for the heII of it? The rest were friends. Also Dali, how can you honestly sit here naging me about asking for comments when you asked to get your VG blogged? Still, I trust your intentions were fine. You just thought "why not?" As for me, it's just the same. Why is that so hard to believe? Isn't it a bit hypocritical of you? Either way, I didn't care if the nuubs commented or not. I did it just because I can. It was somewhat mindless, however, you two are way too closeminded to that possibility so you will try your best not to believe me. That's not a mark of a good friend Dali. Just try and trust me. As for
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng I never asked for any of my creations to be blogged. I also never ask for comments. The quality of my MOCs gets me blogged.
You wanna bet? Look at the blog from your Venus Brute. You also asked them to blog your Venus Gospel. I don't blame you, but still. Also, the quality of my MOCs gets them blogged and commented on.
  June 4, 2009
I never asked for any of my creations to be blogged. I also never ask for comments. The quality of my MOCs gets me blogged.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
very cool!! P.S. Im very close to having all the pieces for my 1rst mech phong! And one more thing the beam or lazer thingy comin out of the gun is very boxy.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
That's really fantastic... I would like to see some new dark grey mech using these techniques, I think it'd turn out really good from you... keep building.
 I made it 
  June 4, 2009
Quoting Matt S. I use light humanoid type mechs when I play Armored Core so I guess I can't complain. (But now I'm gonna have to build a four legged mech!)
Matt do you have X-Box Live? If not, get it and add me. It would be fun talking with you rather than typing.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
I really like the photographing on this one, the main pic is awesome! (I'm not gonna tell you how good your mechs are, guess you know it ^^) but keep up the good photographing ;)
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
The funny bone action is hilarious! ... Unless you are the recipient of this deadly blow ... then it ain't that funny... Devilation Assembly, eh? Interesting... BTW, cool mech!
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
I agree with Dali. You build great mecha but geez Phong! Build something else! (Great mech btw!)
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
I use light humanoid type mechs when I play Armored Core so I guess I can't complain. (But now I'm gonna have to build a four legged mech!)
  June 4, 2009
build something other than mecha
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
don't you hate taking apart good MOCs? it still boggles my mind how you got it to stand on 1 hand. how did you figure that out?!?!?!?
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
Phong, if u want, I can attempt to make some bad guys...they will be different ones than u have planned. Can you join my group, Moc Help? We could use you.
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
wow... i love it... the weapon rules!!!
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
YAY PHONG HAS A NEW MECH!!!!! p.s i made a gurren mech
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
This is probably my favorite of your mechs. I really like the head and torso. I'm working on a micro mech, but I need to make a bricklink order first. It is sort of like a Venus Revelation. Should I post WIP pics?
 I like it 
  June 4, 2009
Nice mech. I like this better than your last one.
Phong Chang
 I like it 
Commander Possible
  June 3, 2009
Cool mecha, but why are they are religiousey?
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Handstands=cool.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Matt S. Tell you what, you build a four legged mech and THEN tell me weather or not it was fun. Untill then I'll stick to my guns ; ).
Not the construction. I mean I want a mecha that fits my personal preference and looks cool to me. In Armored Core, I normally pick bipedals rather than quads.
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Tell you what, you build a four legged mech and THEN tell me weather or not it was fun. Untill then I'll stick to my guns ; ).
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Matt S. Glad your finaly breaking away from copying izzos works. This is great man! It has a kind of android feel to it(Probably the haad) and I really like the pieced together armor! Now you should take apart a few of your mechs and build a fourlegged mech. (Just to get out of this two legged humanoid rut)
I also think you really need to read my homepage note on how I don't copy Izzo.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Cody G dali commented twice. that's ten bucks you owe star blazer, phong. oh, and how come the lazor's square? I've never seen a square lazor before.
I had no more round. Plus hw are we to know how a real lazer blast is. It's to glowy to distingush the depth and shape.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Matt S. Glad your finaly breaking away from copying izzos works. This is great man! It has a kind of android feel to it(Probably the haad) and I really like the pieced together armor! Now you should take apart a few of your mechs and build a fourlegged mech. (Just to get out of this two legged humanoid rut)
I'm more into humanoid and I don't want to waste my parts on something I won't enjoy.
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Glad your finaly breaking away from copying izzos works. This is great man! It has a kind of android feel to it(Probably the haad) and I really like the pieced together armor! Now you should take apart a few of your mechs and build a fourlegged mech. (Just to get out of this two legged humanoid rut)
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng I'm more interested in the bad guys clad in something other than the stereotypical black
Why no funny greetings or commentary lately?? :-(
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng I'm more interested in the bad guys clad in something other than the stereotypical black
Yeah, but the Xioalin Assembly has red taken, so I guess blay will work for the Devilation Assembly. It'll be blay and red.
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
I told you he would come! You owm me $5.
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
I'm more interested in the bad guys clad in something other than the stereotypical black
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting mithryl dlarix You keep referring to enemies--lets see some enemies, man!
I've got a low supply of parts. Until I get a lot of parts, I'll have to postpone the enemies. I need black.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Dali Zheng The name is a bit odd. Chinese/English? This build is better than your last one. By the way, I ordered parts for exactly 5 Sabres. About 2060 pieces >_<
Hi Dali!!!1 c(o_Oc)
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
The name is a bit odd. Chinese/English? This build is better than your last one. By the way, I ordered parts for exactly 5 Sabres. About 2060 pieces >_<
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting L C Where can I get a lot of white pieces (Instead of using PAB)? This is really amazing!
I dunno. PS: HI LC!!!!
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Where can I get a lot of white pieces (Instead of using PAB)? This is really amazing!
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Uhhhhh, sure.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Toby Heinemann Nice work again Phong! The shape is great, kind of jagged and curvy at the same time. That it can do one handed-handstands that low to the ground is simply astonishing. Also, the thing you did with the gun is very... punny... (get it?)
The handstand is done on a matress too, adding to the challenge.
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Nice work again Phong! The shape is great, kind of jagged and curvy at the same time. That it can do one handed-handstands that low to the ground is simply astonishing. Also, the thing you did with the gun is very... punny... (get it?)
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Lord Star-Blazer Well, he'll be a comin' soon.
Oh, you mean Dali will be commenting?
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
Well, he'll be a comin' soon.
 I made it 
  June 3, 2009
Quoting Lord Star-Blazer DALI!!! This is great! 5/5!
I'm not Dali. The name is meant to say "Dai" as in great, not "Dali."
 I like it 
  June 3, 2009
DALI!!! This is great! 5/5!
 
By Phong Chang
Add to my favorite builders

153
people like this. See who.

7,914 visitors
187 comments
Added June 3, 2009
 


LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop Revelation Assembly 05: Dai Nova Zero [Phong-Style]Mecha


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use