Comments
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 18, 2012 |
very nice |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
February 7, 2012 |
Great piece of work. I'm especially impressed by your work to not be bound by the direction of the studs. Very inventive. |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 31, 2011 |
WOW totally awesome would you be willing to sell this. |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 29, 2011 |
Easily one of the best fighter planes I've ever seen on MOC Pages |
|
|
Probably one of the best military plane i've seen on MOC pages! |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 9, 2011 |
I love that tail design and the camouflage. Is that your thumb in the last few photos? ;-) |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 13, 2010 |
This is awesome nice work on this lego creation xd!!!!! |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
March 11, 2010 |
COOL! I made my own version with a gaint lazer but I didn't post it. I'm new. :) |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
April 17, 2009 |
It looks really big!! and the detail on it is just pure perfection!!! you really have done an amazing job well done!!! :) |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
October 27, 2008 |
This would be the best thing on most peoples pages but on yours I think it is the worst. Wow... |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
October 1, 2008 |
this - is - amazing!!!!! even your rockets are so detailed, I am so gonna BURN in this contest... |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
September 23, 2008 |
Awesome looks kinda like The russian/indian proposed T-50 |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
September 18, 2008 |
Thought this wasn't Lego from the thumbnail! Brilliant camoflage and shape. 5/5 |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
September 9, 2008 |
Woah this is cool. I love the camo especially. |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
September 8, 2008 |
Awesome work. Good luck on our first round bout!
Block on Dude!
Laza |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
September 2, 2008 |
This is great! I'm judging for Jeffery's contest, so here are the results. 10/10 Profile. Nice shaping, awesome camo, nice nose, excellent job. 9/10 Weapons. Good, but they could be a little better. 10/10 Technique. Awesome wings and landing gear. 10/10 Creativity. The four-intake design, air scoop, and tailfins are unique and awesome. 9/10 Information. It is good, but I find it awkward to read. A statistics list would make it easier. 9/10 Name. X9 318C is great, but "Shark" is used too often. All in all, 57/60. Excellent job, this is really going to be stiff competition! Nice work -- -- Michael |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 31, 2008 |
Allein von der Größe her ginge die Maschine auch locker als Bomber durch - sie erinnert mich ein bisschen an die britischen V-Bomber - kannst ja mal nachschauen bei Wiki... Steffen |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 31, 2008 |
Because I like this so much, I´m gonna give you the first rating I write for other participants: 1. Overall profile: 10/10 (amazing how it looks on landing gear as well...) 2. Weapons: 09/10 (very diversified armament, but a tad more unison would look cool, too.) 3. Building techniques: 10/10 (tons of interesting aspects - SNOT work, landing gear, wing sweep etc.) 4. Creativity: 09/10 (very unvonventional design features!) 5. Information: 08/10 (the text is cool as an introduction, but a list of specific chosen aspects would make it better) 6. Name: 08/10 (it "hurts" me a bit to say, but the name for such a beast could be more intimidating...)
General score: 54 Boah Sven das ist mein Lieblings-Entry von allen anderen Teilnehmern!! Echt cool! Steffen
|
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 31, 2008 |
Hey Sven:),
Geile Maschine! I love tons of details about it: overall shape and the enormously attractive wing sweep (similar to an F-16), the awesome tail fins (which I agree could be bigger, but they are still awesome), the nose section, the massive four intakes which give it some sort of "monster look", the black, sleek nose cone, the camo pattern and the unconventional fifth intake on top of the fuselage. Awesome work! |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 30, 2008 |
Awesome!!!!!!!!!!The only thing I would change would be to make the tailfins higher, but I love their design!I wish you had instructions!
P.S. check out my creations! |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 29, 2008 |
nicely done, the cockpit looks good, you did a good job on the wings, they are the best parts of your fighter, good job |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 28, 2008 |
Love it! The only thing is the vertical stabilizers. Thy are much too short in height. Also, the wings are a tad too far aft. Other than that, awesome! |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 28, 2008 |
wow man! thats really nice.. very realistic.. keep it up.. peace.. fofo |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 28, 2008 |
That's crazy stuff mate. The only way you could of made it better is if you did a Harrier or Tornado instead ;-). |
|
|
 |
I like it |
|
August 28, 2008 |
My first review! Are you thrilled? I'm thrilled!
I love this thing, especially the original tail design. The amount of detail is also inspiring and the design elements real-world inspired and yet taking it to another level of sci-fi. Your use of colour also gives it a foot in the real world with a cam scheme reminiscent of the Mig-29 and similar Russian fighters.
Great stuff! |
|
|
More from Sven More across MOCpages
|
|
student teen kid toy play lego child video game hobby blocks construction toy legos fun games
|